Scope
Is the topic on the applicable administration’s official outline?
The bar course accuracy and source ledger connects every current-scope subject to the course modules that cover it. A transparent audit layer connecting every current-scope subject and all 213 core modules to the official blueprint, governing authority family, tested-status label, and known scope boundary. 213 core modules across 9 subjects are logged this way, each checked against a named primary source rather than asserted from memory. Every module passes five checks: scope, rule, boundary, application, and maintenance: is the topic on the official outline, does the proposition match the controlling authority, are exceptions stated rather than implied away, does the example use legally decisive facts, and is a date-sensitive field linked to its live source. This documents editorial alignment, not NCBE endorsement, access to live exam content, or attorney certification: the responsible jurisdiction still controls admission requirements.
Practice question review
| Area | Primary source read |
|---|---|
| Evidence | Federal Rules of Evidence 103 to 105, 201, 411, 412 to 415, 501, 502, 605, 606, 610, 612, 615, 702, 801, 803, 804, 805 and 901 to 1006, Cornell LII; Crawford, Davis, Bryant, Clark, Melendez-Diaz, Bullcoming, Bruton, Daubert, Joiner, Kumho and Trammel, Justia; Jaffee v. Redmond, Upjohn and Swidler and Berlin, Justia |
| Civil procedure | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4, 7, 12, 13, 15, 18, 20, 26 to 37, 45, 38, 41, 42, 47 to 52, 54 to 56, 59, 60, 65 and 68, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292, 1367, 1391, 1404, 1406, 1441, 1446, 1447 and 1870, Cornell LII; Twombly, Iqbal, Celotex, Anderson and Scott v. Harris, Justia; Winter, Beacon Theatres, Curtis v. Loether, Batson, Edmonson and Cohen, Justia |
| Contracts and sales | North Carolina General Statutes sections 75-4, 95-25.6, 95-25.7, 95-25.8, 95-25.13 and 95-25.22 (written restraints and wage payment); UCC sections 1-304, 2-201, 2-204, 2-209, 2-305 to 2-317, 2-508, 2-601 to 2-612, 2-711 to 2-719 and 3-311, 15 U.S.C. sections 7001, 7003 and 7006 (E-SIGN), UCC sections 2-102, 2-105, 2-210, 2-318, 2-615, 2-616 and 2-718, and state high-court opinions on consideration, promissory estoppel, minors, undue influence, mistake, reformation, liquidated damages and at-will discharge, Cornell LII and Justia |
| Constitutional and criminal law | Supreme Court opinions, Cornell LII, including Shatzer, Noel Canning, Counterman, Cedar Point, McCullen, Carpenter and Hertz; and, for the added modules, Chadha, Clinton v. City of New York, Youngstown, Brewster, Duncan, McDonald, Alliance for Open Society, Nollan, Muskrat, Michigan v. Long, Schneckloth, Matlock, Randolph, Acevedo, Gant, Leon, Brady, Giglio, Agurs, Winship, Chapman, Batson, Pinkerton and Cheek, and, in the constitutional law modules, Humphrey's Executor, Morrison, Seila Law, Free Enterprise Fund, Mistretta, Loper Bright, Jarkesy, the religion-clause, speech, voting, campaign-finance, association, travel and firearms opinions, and the state sovereign immunity, spending, anticommandeering and preemption opinions; 21 U.S.C. sections 841 and 844, North Carolina General Statutes sections 14-17, 14-51.2 to 14-51.4, 20-138.1 and 20-141.4, and Supreme Court opinions on the exclusionary rule, Miranda, the right to counsel, identification, special-needs searches and homicide burdens |
| Family law | UCCJEA, UIFSA and premarital-agreement act text as enacted in Virginia and North Carolina; 28 U.S.C. § 1738A; 18 U.S.C. § 2265; North Carolina General Statutes §§ 50-16.3A and 50-20; Loving, Zablocki, Obergefell, Troxel, Stanley, Santosky and Turner v. Rogers |
| Business associations | North Carolina General Statutes sections 55-6-40, 55-7-41, 55-7-42, 55-8-30, 55-8-31, 55-8-33 and 55-8-42 (North Carolina Business Corporation Act) and 57D-3-04, 57D-3-20, 57D-3-21, 57D-3-30, 57D-4-05, 57D-4-06, 57D-6-02, 57D-6-07 and 57D-8-01 (North Carolina Limited Liability Company Act); RUPA and the Model Business Corporation Act as enacted in Virginia and Oregon; Delaware General Corporation Law sections 102, 141, 145, 211 to 228, 251, 262, 271 and 275 Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act sections 15-301 to 15-308, Delaware Limited Liability Company Act sections 18-101 to 18-406 and 18-1101, and Delaware General Corporation Law sections 106, 109, 141, 214 and 218, Delaware Code Online; North Carolina General Statutes 55-2-03 and 55-6-22 and state opinions on promoter liability and de facto corporations |
| Torts | Cornell LII Wex entries; Thing v. La Chusa, Dillon, Portee, Gottshall, Farwell and Ragsdale; Supreme Court opinions on defamation, privacy, preemption and economic loss; California and New York statutes on dram shop, social host, apportionment, settlement, privacy and arrest; leading state opinions such as Palsgraf, Tarasoff, Rowland, Thing v. La Chusa, Greenman and Sindell |
| Real property | Federal Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1982 and 12 U.S.C. § 1701j-3; North Carolina General Statutes chapters 42, 45, 46A and 47 and state high-court opinions on lease assignment, habitability, constructive eviction, implied and estoppel easements, joint tenancy and cotenant rent; California Civil Code, Code of Civil Procedure, Probate Code and Business and Professions Code provisions on landlord-tenant, recording, foreclosure, perpetuities, adverse possession and brokerage; North Carolina, Virginia, New York and Minnesota statutes; leading opinions such as Shelley v. Kraemer, Beeler, Robroy, Howard v. Kunto and Mannillo |
Where states differ, a question states the majority or uniform-act rule and says so, or names the statute it applies as an example. The Restatements of Torts and Property are not free to read online, so a point that rests only on a Restatement section is taught as the generally accepted rule and was not matched to a fetched page, and the same is true of the common-law parts of the other subjects. Report an error through the contact form and it goes through the corrections process.
Is the topic on the applicable administration’s official outline?
Does the proposition match the controlling authority family and majority formulation?
Are exceptions, burdens, and jurisdiction variations stated rather than implied away?
Does the example use legally decisive facts and support the conclusion?
Is a date-sensitive field linked to the official live source and visibly dated?
| Subject | Status | Modules |
|---|---|---|
| Civil Procedure | Current foundational doctrine | 25 |
| Constitutional Law | Current foundational doctrine | 21 |
| Contracts | Current foundational doctrine | 24 |
| Criminal Law & Procedure | Current foundational doctrine | 24 |
| Evidence | Current foundational doctrine | 22 |
| Real Property | Current foundational doctrine | 31 |
| Torts | Current foundational doctrine | 28 |
| Business Associations | Current foundational doctrine | 22 |
| Family Law | Supplied-law context through February 2028; foundational beginning July 2028 | 16 |
Jurisdiction, process, venue, Erie, pleadings, joinder, class actions, discovery, adjudication, juries, judgments, review, and preclusion.
• U.S. Constitution arts. III and VI
• 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332, 1367, 1391, 1404, 1406, 1441–1447
• Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
• Federal appellate jurisdiction statutes
State civil procedure is outside the uniform federal-doctrine course unless a supplied resource states it.
Justiciability, structural powers, federalism, due process, equal protection, takings, speech, religion, and association.
• U.S. Constitution
• Controlling U.S. Supreme Court doctrine
• Federal statutes only where identified in the tested framework
The course states majority federal constitutional doctrine; unsettled questions and state constitutional protections require supplied or jurisdiction law.
Common-law and UCC Article 2 formation, terms, defenses, performance, breach, remedies, and third-party rights.
• Restatement (Second) of Contracts principles
• Uniform Commercial Code Article 2
• Common-law contract doctrines in the official outline
UCC Article 2 is included. Secured Transactions under Article 9 is maintained only in the extended library.
Homicide, other offenses, inchoate liability, parties, defenses, search and seizure, interrogation, trial rights, double jeopardy, pleas, and punishment.
• U.S. Constitution amends. IV–VIII and XIV
• Controlling U.S. Supreme Court criminal-procedure doctrine
• Common-law and modern majority criminal-law principles identified by NCBE
Jurisdiction-specific criminal codes and procedure variations are not substituted for the generally tested principles.
Relevance, policy exclusions, character, witnesses, experts, hearsay, confrontation, privileges, authentication, writings, and presumptions.
• Federal Rules of Evidence
• U.S. Constitution amend. VI
• Controlling U.S. Supreme Court Confrontation Clause doctrine
The course uses the Federal Rules of Evidence and tested constitutional overlay; state evidence codes can differ.
Ownership, future interests, co-ownership, landlord-tenant, transfers, deeds, recording, mortgages, servitudes, land use, and possession.
• Common-law and modern majority property principles
• Recording, foreclosure, and land-use doctrines identified in the NCBE outlines
• Federal fair housing and due-on-sale statutes and state statutes on landlord-tenant, recording, foreclosure, perpetuities, adverse possession and brokerage, used as examples of the rule
Highly local statutory variations are excluded unless part of a supplied law set or expressly included in the official tested framework.
Intentional torts, privileges, negligence, causation, damages, shared liability, strict liability, products, defamation, privacy, nuisance, and economic torts.
• Restatement-based and majority common-law tort principles
• Constitutional limits affecting defamation and privacy
• State statutes on apportionment, settlement, dram shop and social host liability, arrest and privacy, and leading state opinions
• Federal preemption of drug and device claims and the economic loss rule
The course uses generally tested majority rules; state reforms to immunities, fault allocation, damages, and products law can vary.
Agency, partnerships, corporations, LLCs, authority, liability, fiduciary duties, governance, claims, and fundamental transactions.
• Restatement (Third) of Agency principles
• Uniform partnership and LLC principles identified by NCBE
• Model Business Corporation Act–based principles identified by NCBE
Exam answers follow supplied statutes when present; otherwise the uniform course uses the national principles described by NCBE, not one state’s corporation code.
Marriage, agreements, divorce, property, support, parentage, custody, interstate jurisdiction, adoption, and family protection.
• Uniform family-law acts identified in the official outline
• Constitutional family-rights doctrine
• Supplied statutes and cases in performance files
Do not memorize family doctrine as a current July 2026–February 2028 foundational NextGen subject; practice using supplied resources. State family law varies substantially.
Deliberate separation
Conflict of Laws, Secured Transactions, and Trusts & Estates remain available in a separate extended library for older administrations, state-drafted exams, and supplied-law work.