2026 transition tracked · Legacy UBE + NextGen UBESee the latest bar exam updates

Homicide · complete doctrine guide

Murder and degrees

Common-law murder is an unlawful killing committed with malice aforethought, and the exam tests whether the facts support one of four distinct routes to that malice rather than a single unified mental state. Intent to kill is the most direct route, intent to inflict serious bodily injury is a second, and depraved-heart murder is a third, requiring conduct so recklessly indifferent to human life that it demonstrates an abandoned and malignant heart even without any specific intent to kill or injure anyone. Felony murder is the fourth and most heavily tested route: it requires an independent qualifying felony and a death that occurs during and in furtherance of it, subject to the agency limitation on who can cause the death, the merger doctrine excluding felonies that are part of the killing itself, and rules about how long the felony continues, generally through immediate flight until the felons reach a point of temporary safety.

TESTED STATUSCurrent MBE, MEE where applicable, and NextGen foundational doctrine
01 · COMPLETE FRAMEWORK

Black-letter propositions

  1. 01

    Premeditated and deliberate killings are commonly first degree by statute; other malicious killings are second degree unless another category applies.

  2. 02

    Depraved-heart murder requires extreme recklessness demonstrating indifference to human life.

  3. 03

    Felony murder requires a qualifying independent felony and a death during and in furtherance of it, subject to agency, merger, causation, and duration limits.

  4. 04

    A felony can continue through immediate flight until temporary safety.

  5. 05

    The defendant takes the victim as found, but must legally cause the death.

02 · ORDER OF ANALYSIS

Use this attack sequence under time

1

Frame the issue

Classify the homicide.

2

Resolve the next checkpoint

Identify exact malice theory.

3

Resolve the next checkpoint

For felony murder: felony, independence, timing, agency, and cause.

4

Finish the conclusion

Then test defenses and mitigation.

03 · DISTINCTIONS THAT CREATE POINTS

Common wrong turns

  • An assaultive felony that causes death often merges.
  • Premeditation can be brief but requires actual reflection.
  • Foreseeability is important but does not replace the jurisdiction's felony-murder limitations.
04 · WORKED APPLICATION

Worked example

During an armed robbery, an accomplice's gun accidentally fires and kills a customer.

Model analysis

Robbery is an independent dangerous felony and the death occurred during it. Felony murder is likely if the jurisdiction follows accomplice-caused death and ordinary causation rules.

05 · CLOSED-BOOK RETRIEVAL

Practice this topic

06 · FROM THE PRIMARY TEXT

Common-law murder

Cornell defines murder as the unlawful killing of another person and says it is a category of homicide, since not all homicide is unlawful. At common law murder was killing another human being with malice aforethought, which covers intent-to-kill murder, grievous-bodily-harm murder in an attack intended to cause grievous bodily harm, felony murder when a death occurs during a felony, and depraved-heart murder such as firing a gun into a crowded room.

A defendant can be liable for murder even if the defendant only intended to wound the victim, if the intent was grievous bodily harm.

07 · FROM THE PRIMARY TEXT

Degrees

Cornell says most states distinguish first, second and third degree murder, and some use the Model Penal Code definitions. It describes the Pennsylvania method: first-degree murder includes willful, deliberate and premeditated murder, particularly heinous killings such as poisoning or lying in wait, and felony murder for listed felonies. All other murder is second degree.

Because the precise definition varies by jurisdiction, state the rule your course uses before applying it to the facts.

Cornell's description of depraved-heart murder, such as intentionally firing a gun into a crowded room so that someone dies, shows that intent to kill a specific person is not the only route to murder. It also notes that these historic definitions inform later reforms of American criminal law. When a fact pattern involves a death, list which theory of malice the facts support and then check whether the jurisdiction grades murder by degree.

08 · QUICK ANSWERS

Frequently asked questions

What is the controlling rule for murder and degrees?+

Murder is an unlawful killing with intent-to-kill, serious-injury, depraved-heart, or qualifying felony-murder malice, with degree rules layered on top.

What is murder on the bar exam?+

The unlawful killing of another person, a category of homicide because not all homicide is unlawful, according to Cornell's summary.

What is malice aforethought at common law?+

A term of art at common law covering intent-to-kill murder, grievous-bodily-harm murder, felony murder and depraved-heart murder, according to Cornell.

Can a person be liable for murder without intending to kill?+

Yes. Cornell says a defendant is liable for murder even if the defendant only intended to wound, when the attack was intended to cause grievous bodily harm.

What is first-degree murder under the Pennsylvania method?+

Willful, deliberate and premeditated murder, particularly heinous types such as poisoning or ambush, and felony murder for certain listed felonies.

Do all states define murder the same way?+

No. The precise legal definition of murder varies by jurisdiction, and some states use the Model Penal Code definitions.

SOURCE DESK

Primary sources

Cornell LII Wex: murder↗

Governing text for murder and degrees

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (U.S. Courts) ↗