2026 transition tracked · Legacy UBE + NextGen UBESee the latest bar exam updates

Subject 03 of 9

Contracts for the bar exam

Contracts is a core subject on the MBE, where it accounts for 25 scored questions, and it is a frequent MEE topic, often paired with a sale of goods. The first decision on almost every question is which body of law governs: the common law for services and land, or UCC Article 2 for goods. From there the analysis runs through formation, consideration or its substitutes, defenses, interpretation and the parol evidence rule, performance and conditions, breach, and remedies. A question that looks like a formation issue often turns out to be a modification or Statute of Frauds issue instead, so check both before committing to an answer. Use the Contracts outline for late review. Pay particular attention to the places where the common law and the UCC give different answers, such as the mirror-image rule, modification and the statute of frauds, because those are the differences examiners test.

24deep scope modules
188rules and propositions
24worked applications
96retrieval drills

Complete long-form outline

Modules in the full outline

Prefer one continuous document? Read the Contracts outline instead.

Contracts coverage by unit
UnitRule bank entriesEncyclopedia modules
Formation23
Consideration10
Defenses11
Terms and interpretation10
Performance and conditions10
Breach10
Remedies12
Third-party rights20
01 · Governing law

Common law, UCC Article 2, and mixed contracts

Common law governs services and real estate, while UCC Article 2 governs transactions in goods; mixed contracts ordinarily use the predominant-purpose test.

4 propositions · open complete guide →
02 · Formation

Offer, preliminary negotiation, and indefiniteness

An offer is an objective present commitment communicated to an identified or objectively identifiable offeree with sufficiently certain terms.

4 propositions · open complete guide →
03 · Formation

Termination of offers and option protection

An offeree's power of acceptance ends by revocation, rejection, counteroffer, lapse, death or incapacity, or destruction or illegality, unless protected by an option or related doctrine.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
04 · Formation

Acceptance, mailbox rule, and unilateral performance

Acceptance is an objective manifestation of assent in the manner invited by the offer, with timing governed by communication and option rules.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
05 · Bargain

Consideration, modification, and promissory estoppel

A bargained-for exchange of legal value supports a promise, while reliance can sometimes substitute for consideration to avoid injustice.

4 propositions · open complete guide →
06 · Defenses

Capacity, mistake, misrepresentation, duress, and unconscionability

A contract may be void or voidable when assent is impaired, information is materially false, bargaining is improperly coerced, or terms and process are unconscionable.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
07 · Writing and terms

Statute of Frauds and parol evidence

Certain agreements require a signed writing, while the parol-evidence rule limits prior or contemporaneous terms that contradict or supplement a final integrated writing.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
08 · UCC formation

Battle of the forms and gap fillers

Under Article 2, a definite and seasonable expression of acceptance can form a contract despite additional or different terms unless acceptance is expressly conditional.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
09 · Performance

Conditions, substantial performance, and material breach

Contract duties can be expressly or constructively conditioned; failure of a condition may excuse performance, while breach creates remedial liability.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
10 · Sales performance

Perfect tender, cure, installment contracts, and risk of loss

Article 2 permits rejection for nonconforming goods subject to cure, installment-contract, acceptance, revocation, and risk-allocation rules.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
11 · Breach and excuse

Anticipatory repudiation, assurance, impracticability, and frustration

A clear preperformance refusal can create immediate breach, while supervening events may excuse duties under narrowly defined doctrines.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
12 · Remedies

Expectation, reliance, restitution, and limitations

Contract remedies protect expectation, reliance, or restitution interests, subject to proof, foreseeability, causation, certainty, and mitigation.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
13 · Remedies

Specific performance, liquidated damages, and UCC remedies

Equitable and agreed remedies supplement money damages when their specialized requirements are met.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
14 · Third parties

Beneficiaries, assignment, delegation, and novation

Contract rights and duties may affect third parties through intended-beneficiary, assignment, delegation, and substitution doctrines.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
15 · Sales of goods

UCC warranties: express, merchantability, fitness, disclaimers, and remedy limits

In a sale of goods, express and implied warranties can arise without any formal promise, and the seller can disclaim or limit them only in the ways UCC Article 2 allows.

12 propositions · open complete guide →
16 · Sales of goods

Buyer's rights on nonconforming goods: rejection, acceptance, revocation, cure, cover, and damages

A buyer faced with nonconforming goods must choose among rejecting, accepting, or revoking acceptance, and the choice controls the remedies: cover, market-price damages, or damages for accepted goods.

12 propositions · open complete guide →
17 · Sales of goods

Sales contracts with open terms: formation, price, delivery, time, and cooperation

Article 2 lets parties form a contract for the sale of goods even when terms are missing, and it supplies gap fillers for price, place, time, and payment.

12 propositions · open complete guide →
18 · Sales of goods

Modification, waiver, no-oral-modification clauses, and accord and satisfaction by check

Under Article 2 a modification needs no consideration, a signed no-oral-modification clause has limits, an ineffective modification can still be a waiver, and a check marked as full payment can discharge a disputed debt.

11 propositions · open complete guide →
19 · Defenses to enforceability

Electronic signatures and records: the federal E-SIGN Act and its exceptions

Federal law provides that a signature, contract, or record in a transaction in or affecting interstate commerce cannot be denied legal effect solely because it is electronic, subject to consumer-consent conditions and to listed exceptions such as wills, family-law matters, and certain notices.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
20 · Formation of contracts

Consideration, forbearance, moral obligation, and promissory estoppel: Hamer, Kirksey, Webb, Red Owl, and Drennan

A promise is enforceable as a bargain when something is promised, done, or given up in exchange for it, including a waiver of a legal right, and a promise without consideration can still be enforced when the promisor should expect and gets substantial reliance and injustice can be avoided only by enforcement, or in some states when it is a promise to pay for a past material benefit.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
21 · Defenses to enforceability

Minors, undue influence, mutual mistake, reformation, and nondisclosure (Dodson, Odorizzi, MacKay, Hylton, Laidlaw)

A minor may generally disaffirm a contract, though some states let the seller deduct for use, a contract obtained by excessive pressure on a vulnerable person may be rescinded for undue influence, a mutual mistake about a basic existing fact can avoid a contract, a writing that misstates the parties' agreement can be reformed, and a buyer generally has no duty to volunteer facts affecting price.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
22 · Breach and discharge

Liquidated damages, excuse by impracticability under the UCC, and wrongful discharge of at-will employees

Liquidated damages are enforceable only if reasonable in light of anticipated or actual harm, a seller is excused from delivery when a basic assumption fails and performance becomes impracticable but must allocate and notify, and an employee at will generally may be discharged for any reason except one that violates a well-established public policy.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
23 · Third-party rights and obligations

Third-party beneficiaries, delegation and assignment under the UCC, and the scope of Article 2

Article 2 applies to transactions in goods, meaning movable things other than money, investment securities, and things in action, a party may generally delegate performance and assign rights unless the other party has a substantial interest or the change is material, general assignment language is both an assignment and a delegation, third parties beneficiaries can enforce some warranties, and third parties generally cannot enforce government contracts that merely incorporate statutory duties.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
24 · Formation of contracts

Employment agreements: written restraints on trade, wage payment, deductions, and final pay under North Carolina law

A North Carolina agreement limiting a person's right to do business in the State must be in writing and signed by the party who agrees not to compete, an employer must pay all wages accruing on the regular payday and must pay a separated employee all wages due by the next regular payday, an employer may withhold wages only when required by law or authorized in writing in the way the statute requires, bonus and commission wages cannot be forfeited unless the employee was notified of the policy, and an employer who violates the wage provisions owes the unpaid wages, interest, and liquidated damages equal to the amount due unless it shows good faith and reasonable grounds.

12 propositions · open complete guide →
Core rule bankElementsTrapsWorked examples
01

UNIT

Formation

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Offer

An offer is an objective manifestation of present commitment with reasonably certain terms communicated to an identified or objectively identifiable offeree.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Objective commitment
  2. Sufficiently definite terms
  3. Communication
  4. Offeree power of acceptance
Exam trap

Advertisements are usually invitations to negotiate unless clear, definite, and leaving nothing open.

Application example

‘One coat, first person at 9 a.m., $100’ can be an offer; ‘coats from $100’ usually is not.

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Acceptance and mailbox rule

Acceptance must comply with the invited method; unless an exception applies, acceptance by an authorized noninstantaneous means is effective on dispatch.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Unequivocal acceptance
  2. Authorized method
  3. Timely dispatch
  4. No option-contract or receipt exception
Exam trap

An option-contract acceptance is generally effective upon receipt, not dispatch.

Application example

A properly mailed acceptance ordinarily forms a contract before a later-received revocation.

02

UNIT

Consideration

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Bargained-for exchange

Consideration requires a bargained-for legal detriment or benefit; courts ordinarily do not evaluate adequacy, but past consideration and illusory promises do not qualify.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Bargain
  2. Legal value
  3. Mutual inducement
  4. No illusory reservation
Exam trap

A promise to perform a preexisting legal duty is generally not new consideration under common law.

Application example

A promise to pay more for the same construction work needs an exception or new consideration.

03

UNIT

Defenses

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Mutual mistake

A contract is voidable when both parties were mistaken about a basic assumption, the mistake materially affects the exchange, and the adversely affected party did not bear the risk.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Existing fact
  2. Shared mistake
  3. Basic assumption
  4. Material effect
  5. Risk not allocated
Exam trap

A mistaken prediction about future market value ordinarily is not a mistake of existing fact.

Application example

Both parties’ erroneous belief that a specific animal was infertile can support avoidance if risk was not assigned.

04

UNIT

Terms and interpretation

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Parol-evidence rule

A final integrated writing bars prior or contemporaneous agreements that contradict it and, if complete, consistent additional terms, subject to recognized exceptions.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Final writing
  2. Timing of outside term
  3. Complete or partial integration
  4. Exception such as interpretation, defense, or condition precedent
Exam trap

The rule does not bar evidence of later modifications.

Application example

Evidence that fraud induced the agreement may be admitted despite an integration clause.

05

UNIT

Performance and conditions

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Common-law material breach

Substantial performance ordinarily triggers the other party’s duty subject to damages; a material breach may suspend performance, and an uncured material breach can become total.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Extent of performance
  2. Benefit deprivation
  3. Adequacy of compensation
  4. Forfeiture
  5. Likelihood of cure
  6. Good faith
Exam trap

The UCC perfect-tender rule does not govern common-law service or construction contracts.

Application example

A minor, repairable deviation in a completed house often supports damages rather than total nonpayment.

06

UNIT

Breach

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Anticipatory repudiation

A clear, unequivocal preperformance refusal permits the nonbreaching party to treat the contract as breached, suspend performance, and seek remedies, subject to retraction rules.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Executory duties remain
  2. Unequivocal repudiation
  3. Retraction before material change or reliance
  4. Adequate assurance rules when applicable
Exam trap

Reasonable insecurity alone is not necessarily repudiation, though the UCC may permit a demand for assurance.

Application example

‘I will not deliver at any price’ is repudiation; ‘delivery may be difficult’ generally is not.

07

UNIT

Remedies

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Expectation and limitations

Expectation damages put the injured party in the position performance would have created, limited by causation, foreseeability, reasonable certainty, mitigation, and the ban on economic waste.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Loss in value plus incidental and consequential loss
  2. Less avoided cost and loss
  3. Foreseeability
  4. Certainty
  5. Mitigation
Exam trap

Punitive damages ordinarily are unavailable for an ordinary contract breach.

Application example

Detailed precontract notice of a resale may make proven lost profit foreseeable.

08

UNIT

Third-party rights

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Intended beneficiary

An intended beneficiary may enforce after rights vest; an incidental beneficiary may not. Vesting commonly occurs upon assent, reliance, or suit.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Intent to benefit
  2. Performance satisfies obligation or gives promised benefit
  3. Vesting
  4. No effective modification after vesting
Exam trap

Receiving a benefit from performance does not alone make a person an intended beneficiary.

Application example

A named creditor to be paid directly is generally intended; nearby businesses benefiting from construction are incidental.

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Assignment and delegation

Contract rights are generally assignable unless prohibited or materially changing the obligor’s risk; duties are generally delegable unless personal or prohibited, but delegation does not release the delegator absent novation.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Identify right or duty
  2. Check prohibition and material change
  3. Notice and defenses
  4. Delegator remains liable absent novation
Exam trap

An assignment of ‘the contract’ may both assign rights and delegate duties.

Application example

A famous portrait commission cannot ordinarily be delegated to an unknown painter without consent.

How mastery works

How to study Contracts

The course separately measures retrieval, discrimination, fact application, writing, integrated judgment, and timed completion so memorization is never mistaken for readiness.

QUICK ANSWERS

Questions about Contracts on the bar exam

How many Contracts questions are scored on the MBE?+

25 of the 175 scored questions, according to NCBE's statement that each of the seven subject areas supplies 25.

What law do I assume for Contracts questions on the MBE?+

That the Official Text of Articles 1 and 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code has been adopted and is in effect, according to NCBE's outline note.

How much of the Contracts section is based on the UCC?+

Approximately one-fourth of the Contracts questions are based on the Official Text of UCC Articles 1 and 2, according to NCBE.

Which Contracts categories carry the most weight?+

Formation of contracts, and performance, breach and discharge. NCBE says approximately half the questions come from those two categories.

What are the six categories in NCBE's Contracts outline?+

Formation, defenses to enforceability, contract content and meaning, performance, breach and discharge, remedies, and third-party rights.

Where do warranties fall in the Contracts outline?+

Under category IV, performance, breach and discharge, where NCBE lists express and implied warranties in sale-of-goods contracts as topic E.

How many answer choices does a Contracts question have?+

Four, like every MBE question, and you should choose the best answer according to generally accepted fundamental legal principles.

Should I guess on MBE Contracts questions?+

Yes. NCBE says scores are based on the number of questions answered correctly and points are not subtracted for incorrect answers.

Governing text

Contracts questions on the sale of goods are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code, whose official text and drafting history the Uniform Law Commission keeps. Uniform Commercial Code (Uniform Law Commission) ↗