2026 transition tracked · Legacy UBE + NextGen UBESee the latest bar exam updates

Subject 04 of 9

Criminal Law & Procedure for the bar exam

Criminal Law and Procedure has 25 scored MBE questions, split between substantive offenses and defenses on one side and constitutional criminal procedure on the other, and it appears on the MEE as well. The substantive half asks you to define an offense by its elements, such as the four forms of common-law malice for murder, then test defenses and inchoate liability against the facts. The procedure half turns on the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments: whether there was a search, whether a warrant exception applies, whether Miranda was triggered, and whether counsel was required. A fact pattern will often raise a substantive issue and a procedure issue in the same question, so decide which half each call is actually asking about before answering. The outline for this subject is easier to skim before the exam than to learn from.

24deep scope modules
193rules and propositions
24worked applications
96retrieval drills

Complete long-form outline

Modules in the full outline

Prefer one continuous document? Read the Criminal Law & Procedure outline instead.

Criminal Law & Procedure coverage by unit
UnitRule bank entriesEncyclopedia modules
Homicide12
Other offenses10
Inchoate crimes10
Parties10
Defenses10
Search and seizure20
Interrogation10
Trial rights21
01 · Foundations

Act, culpability, and causation

Criminal liability ordinarily requires a voluntary act or qualifying omission, the prescribed culpability, concurrence, and causation when a result is an element.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
02 · Homicide

Murder and degrees

Common-law murder is an unlawful killing with malice aforethought, shown by intent to kill, intent to inflict serious injury, extreme recklessness, or felony murder.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
03 · Homicide

Manslaughter and mitigation

Voluntary manslaughter mitigates an intentional killing for adequate provocation, while involuntary manslaughter commonly covers criminal negligence or a lesser unlawful act.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
04 · Offenses against persons

Assault, battery, confinement, and kidnapping

Person offenses require the act, injury or apprehension, mental state, and circumstances specified by common law or statute.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
05 · Property offenses

Theft offenses, robbery, burglary, and arson

Common-law property offenses are distinguished by possession, title, fraud, force, entry, and the timing of intent.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
06 · Inchoate liability

Attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy

Inchoate crimes punish purpose toward an offense, asking another to commit it, or unlawful agreement, with distinct act, merger, withdrawal, and impossibility rules.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
07 · Complicity

Accomplice liability and withdrawal

An accomplice purposefully assists or encourages the principal and is liable for the target offense and any qualifying additional offenses under the jurisdiction's rule.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
08 · Justification

Self-defense, defense of others, property, and necessity

Justification makes conduct lawful when reasonably necessary and proportionate to an imminent unlawful threat or greater harm.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
09 · Excuse and negation

Insanity, intoxication, duress, mistake, and entrapment

Excuse and mens-rea defenses focus on capacity, coercion, culpability, or government inducement rather than making the act lawful.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
10 · Fourth Amendment

Searches, seizures, warrants, and personal rights

The Fourth Amendment regulates unreasonable government searches and seizures where the defendant personally has a reasonable privacy expectation or protected property interest.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
11 · Fourth Amendment

Warrant exceptions and police encounters

Warrantless searches are presumptively unreasonable unless a specific exception applies, and street encounters require the cause level matching their restraint.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
12 · Statements

Miranda, voluntariness, and counsel

Use of a defendant's statements depends separately on due-process voluntariness, Miranda custodial interrogation, and the offense-specific Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

5 propositions · open complete guide →
13 · Trial rights

Identification, disclosure, confrontation, jury, and counsel

Constitutional procedure protects reliable identification, disclosure of material favorable evidence, effective counsel at critical stages, confrontation, and an impartial jury.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
14 · Finality

Double jeopardy, pleas, and punishment

Double jeopardy bars repeated prosecution or multiple punishment for the same offense after attachment, subject to sovereign, mistrial, appeal, and greater-lesser rules.

6 propositions · open complete guide →
15 · Fourth Amendment

Consent, vehicle searches, and the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule

Police may search without a warrant with valid consent, may search a car and its containers on probable cause, and may search a car incident to arrest only in limited cases, and evidence found by officers who reasonably rely on an invalid warrant is usually not suppressed.

12 propositions · open complete guide →
16 · Criminal procedure

Prosecutor disclosure, the reasonable-doubt standard, harmless error, and race-based jury strikes

Due process requires the prosecution to disclose material evidence favorable to the accused, to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and to avoid race-based jury strikes, and constitutional trial error is reviewed for harmlessness beyond a reasonable doubt.

12 propositions · open complete guide →
17 · Accomplice and conspiracy liability

Conspiracy, Pinkerton liability, accessories, and mistake of law

A conspirator can be punished for the conspiracy and for the crimes of coconspirators committed in furtherance of it, an accessory after the fact is punished separately, and a good-faith mistake about the law can negate willfulness only when the statute requires knowledge of the legal duty.

12 propositions · open complete guide →
18 · Statutory crimes

Drug possession and distribution offenses, impaired driving, and death or injury by vehicle (federal statutes and North Carolina as the model)

Federal law separates knowing possession of a controlled substance from possession with intent to distribute and from distribution, and grades distribution penalties by drug and quantity, while impaired-driving statutes define the offense by driving plus impairment or a measured alcohol concentration, with more serious offenses when a death or injury results.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
19 · Fourth Amendment

Fruit of the poisonous tree: independent source, inevitable discovery, attenuation, and knock-and-announce

The exclusionary rule bars primary evidence and its derivative fruits, but courts admit evidence that was found independently of the illegality, that would inevitably have been found lawfully, or whose link to the illegality is too attenuated, and a knock-and-announce violation alone does not require suppression.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
20 · Fifth Amendment

Miranda: custody warnings, invoking rights, waiver, undercover agents, and Dickerson

Statements from custodial interrogation are admissible only if the police used the Miranda safeguards, a suspect must clearly invoke the right to counsel or to silence, a waiver can be implied from an understanding of the rights and a course of conduct, and undercover agents posing as fellow inmates need not give warnings.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
21 · Sixth Amendment

Right to counsel: appointment, attachment, ineffective assistance, self-representation, and conflicts

The Sixth Amendment gives an accused the right to counsel in criminal prosecutions, which attaches at the start of adversary judicial proceedings, includes appointed counsel for an indigent felony defendant, guarantees effective assistance judged by deficient performance and prejudice, and lets a competent defendant waive counsel and represent himself.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
22 · Constitutional protections of accused persons

Eyewitness identification: lineups, showups, voice and physical exemplars, and due process reliability

A post-indictment lineup is a critical stage at which the accused has a Sixth Amendment right to counsel, compelled lineup appearances and voice samples raise no Fifth Amendment problem, and due process excludes an identification only when police used an unnecessarily suggestive procedure that created a substantial likelihood of misidentification.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
23 · Fourth Amendment

Administrative and suspicionless searches: schools, checkpoints, borders, new technology, and community caretaking

Some searches and seizures are reasonable without a warrant or individualized suspicion, including school searches judged by reasonableness, certain checkpoints, and border searches, while thermal imaging of a home, GPS tracking, cell-site records, and cell-phone searches are searches that generally need a warrant, and community caretaking justifies vehicle inventories but not warrantless home entries.

11 propositions · open complete guide →
24 · Statutory crimes

Homicide grading, felony murder, self-defense, and burdens of proof (North Carolina statutes and Supreme Court cases)

North Carolina divides murder into first and second degree, treats a killing in listed felonies as first-degree murder, and defines defensive force by reasonable belief of imminent death or great bodily harm, with no duty to retreat, unless the defender was committing a felony or provoked the fight, while the Constitution requires proof of elements beyond a reasonable doubt but lets a state place the burden of an affirmative mitigating defense on the defendant.

10 propositions · open complete guide →
Core rule bankElementsTrapsWorked examples
01

UNIT

Homicide

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Common-law murder

Murder is an unlawful killing with malice aforethought, shown by intent to kill, intent to cause serious bodily harm, depraved-heart recklessness, or qualifying felony murder.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Unlawful killing
  2. Actual and proximate causation
  3. One malice form
  4. No adequate mitigation
Exam trap

Premeditation is associated with first-degree murder statutes, not required for common-law malice.

Application example

Firing into a crowded room without targeting anyone may show depraved-heart malice.

02

UNIT

Other offenses

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Larceny

Larceny is trespassory taking and carrying away of personal property of another with intent to permanently deprive.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Trespassory taking
  2. Asportation
  3. Personal property of another
  4. Concurrent intent to permanently deprive
Exam trap

If the defendant originally obtains possession lawfully, later conversion may be embezzlement rather than larceny.

Application example

Taking a phone intending to keep it satisfies even minimal carrying away.

03

UNIT

Inchoate crimes

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Attempt

Attempt requires specific intent to commit the target offense plus an act sufficiently close under the jurisdiction’s test, commonly a substantial step strongly corroborative of criminal purpose.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Specific intent
  2. Substantial step or dangerous proximity
  3. Beyond mere preparation
  4. No completed offense required
Exam trap

Factual impossibility ordinarily is not a defense; legal impossibility may be.

Application example

Arriving with tools and beginning to force the target safe can be a substantial step even if the safe is empty.

04

UNIT

Parties

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Accomplice liability

An accomplice intentionally aids, encourages, or facilitates the principal with the purpose required by the jurisdiction and is liable for the target crime and often foreseeable crimes in furtherance.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Aid or encouragement
  2. Required intent
  3. Principal offense
  4. Scope of derivative liability
Exam trap

Mere presence and knowledge are generally insufficient without a duty or purposeful assistance.

Application example

Serving as a planned lookout with intent to facilitate burglary creates accomplice liability.

05

UNIT

Defenses

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Self-defense

A nonaggressor may use proportionate force when reasonably believing it necessary against imminent unlawful force; deadly force generally requires a threat of death or serious bodily harm.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Reasonable belief
  2. Imminence
  3. Unlawfulness
  4. Proportionality
  5. Aggressor and retreat rules
Exam trap

Deadly force is not justified solely to protect property.

Application example

A reasonable response to an immediate knife attack may include deadly force.

06

UNIT

Search and seizure

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Fourth Amendment search

Government conduct is a search when it intrudes on a reasonable expectation of privacy or physically trespasses on protected persons, houses, papers, or effects to obtain information.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Government action
  2. Search or seizure
  3. Standing through personal rights
  4. Warrant or exception
  5. Proper scope
Exam trap

A defendant cannot vicariously assert another person’s Fourth Amendment rights.

Application example

Placing a tracking device on a suspect’s car to obtain information can be a search.

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Search incident to arrest

After a lawful custodial arrest, police may search the arrestee and the area within immediate control; vehicle searches incident to arrest follow narrower rules.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Lawful arrest
  2. Contemporaneous search
  3. Permitted person and grabbing area
  4. Vehicle-specific justification
Exam trap

Police may not automatically search an entire vehicle whenever a recent occupant is arrested.

Application example

A vehicle passenger compartment may be searched if the arrestee can access it or evidence of the arrest offense may be inside.

07

UNIT

Interrogation

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Miranda

Miranda warnings precede custodial interrogation. Custody asks whether a reasonable person would feel freedom curtailed to the degree associated with formal arrest; interrogation includes words reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Government questioning
  2. Custody
  3. Interrogation
  4. Warnings and valid waiver
  5. Invocation rules
Exam trap

A routine traffic stop ordinarily is not Miranda custody, though roadside questions can still be interrogation.

Application example

Direct questioning after handcuffing and station-house detention requires warnings absent an exception.

08

UNIT

Trial rights

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Sixth Amendment counsel

After adversarial judicial proceedings begin, the accused has a right to counsel at critical stages, and government deliberate elicitation about the charged offense without counsel violates that offense-specific right.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Formal commencement
  2. Charged offense
  3. Critical stage or deliberate elicitation
  4. No valid waiver
Exam trap

The Sixth Amendment right is offense specific; Miranda’s Fifth Amendment protection is not framed the same way.

Application example

A wired informant deliberately eliciting statements about an indicted charge can violate the right.

CONTROLLING FRAMEWORK

Double jeopardy

Jeopardy attaches when the jury is sworn or, in a bench trial, when the first witness is sworn, barring successive prosecution or multiple punishment for the same offense subject to exceptions.

Elements and checkpoints
  1. Attachment
  2. Same sovereign
  3. Same offense under elements test
  4. No mistrial or appeal exception
Exam trap

Separate sovereigns may prosecute the same conduct under their respective laws.

Application example

A conviction reversed for insufficient evidence generally cannot be retried; reversal for trial error generally can.

How mastery works

How to study Criminal Law & Procedure

The course separately measures retrieval, discrimination, fact application, writing, integrated judgment, and timed completion so memorization is never mistaken for readiness.

QUICK ANSWERS

Questions about Criminal Law & Procedure on the bar exam

How many Criminal Law and Procedure questions are scored on the MBE?+

25 of the 175 scored questions, since NCBE distributes them evenly across the seven subject areas.

Which Criminal Law and Procedure category is tested most?+

Constitutional protection of accused persons. NCBE says approximately half the questions are based on it, and the other half come from the four remaining categories.

What are the five categories in NCBE's Criminal Law and Procedure outline?+

Homicide, other crimes, inchoate crimes and parties, general principles, and constitutional protection of accused persons, numbered I through V in the outline.

Where does the right to counsel appear in the Criminal Law and Procedure outline?+

In category V, constitutional protection of accused persons, as topic D, after lineups and other forms of identification and before fair trial and guilty pleas.

What legal standard applies to MBE criminal law questions?+

Each question is designed to be answered according to generally accepted fundamental legal principles unless noted otherwise, according to NCBE.

How many questions are on the MBE in total?+

200 multiple-choice questions, 175 scored and 25 unscored pretest questions, which NCBE says are indistinguishable from scored ones.

Should I answer unscored pretest questions?+

Yes. NCBE says pretest questions are indistinguishable from those that are scored, so examinees should answer all questions.

How long are the MBE sessions?+

Three hours each with 100 questions per session and no scheduled breaks during either session, according to NCBE.

Governing text

The procedural half of this subject follows the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, published in full by the federal courts. Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (U.S. Courts) ↗